Publications
2013

Daly, Ian; Sweeney-Reed, Catherine; Nasuto, Slawomir J.
Testing for significance of phase synchronisation dynamics in the EEG Journal Article
In: Journal of Computational Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 411-432, 2013.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: EEG, Functional connectivity, Markov models, Semi-Markov models, Significance testing
@article{Daly2012phase,
title = {Testing for significance of phase synchronisation dynamics in the EEG},
author = {Ian Daly and Catherine Sweeney-Reed and Slawomir J. Nasuto},
url = {http://www.iandaly.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Testing-for-significance-of-phase-synchronisation-dynamics-in.pdf},
doi = {10.1007/s10827-012-0428-2},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-06-01},
journal = {Journal of Computational Neuroscience},
volume = {34},
number = {3},
pages = {411-432},
abstract = {A number of tests exist to check for statistical significance of phase synchronisation within the Electroencephalogram (EEG); however, the majority suffer from a lack of generality and applicability. They may also fail to account for temporal dynamics in the phase synchronisation, regarding synchronisation as a constant state instead of a dynamical process. Therefore, a novel test is developed for identifying the statistical significance of phase synchronisation based upon a combination of work characterising temporal dynamics of multivariate time-series and Markov modelling. We show how this method is better able to assess the significance of phase synchronisation than a range of commonly used significance tests. We also show how the method may be applied to identify and classify significantly different phase synchronisation dynamics in both univariate and multivariate datasets.},
keywords = {EEG, Functional connectivity, Markov models, Semi-Markov models, Significance testing},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
A number of tests exist to check for statistical significance of phase synchronisation within the Electroencephalogram (EEG); however, the majority suffer from a lack of generality and applicability. They may also fail to account for temporal dynamics in the phase synchronisation, regarding synchronisation as a constant state instead of a dynamical process. Therefore, a novel test is developed for identifying the statistical significance of phase synchronisation based upon a combination of work characterising temporal dynamics of multivariate time-series and Markov modelling. We show how this method is better able to assess the significance of phase synchronisation than a range of commonly used significance tests. We also show how the method may be applied to identify and classify significantly different phase synchronisation dynamics in both univariate and multivariate datasets.